This passage appears to be a scathing book review, likely from someone who thoroughly detested 'Diary of an Oxygen Thief' by its anonymous author. The reviewer uses extremely negative language throughout the text, frequently employing adjectives such as 'stupid', 'awful', and 'horrendous' in their critique.

Some key points made about the novel include:

1. It begins with a weak opening line that fails to hook readers.

2. The narrative is described as 'paranoiac' and excessively focused on inflicting emotional abuse upon women, which quickly becomes tiresome for the reader.

3. The writing style is characterized as crude, impudent, and altogether inane.

The reviewer also criticizes several aspects of the book's structure and content:

1. They claim that despite initial promise, neither the narrative nor its characters ever improve throughout the novel.

2. There are frequent instances of repetitive or redundant information being presented to readers.

3. The author suggests that some scenes may be considered excessively graphic or explicit for certain audiences.

Additionally, there appears to be criticism directed at both the book's literary merit and its commercial success:

1. Despite achieving 'New York Times' bestseller status, it is dismissed as an unworthy read.

2. It is suggested that readers would be better off spending their time elsewhere on other websites or articles than persisting with this novel.

Overall, based on these points alone, the review appears to be highly negative and unenthusiastic about 'Diary of an Oxygen Thief.

Diary of an oxygen thief 3